What is wrong with Ares in “Through My Window”?
In the captivating poem “Through My Window,” by A.E. Housman, the speaker laments the absence of a loved one, using vivid imagery to convey his deep longing. However, there are several issues that can be identified with Ares in this poem, which ultimately detract from its emotional impact.
Firstly, the portrayal of Ares is inconsistent with the traditional representation of the Greek god of war. In the poem, Ares is depicted as a figure of sorrow and despair, which contradicts his usual association with brute strength and aggression. This inconsistency weakens the overall coherence of the poem and creates confusion for the reader regarding the true nature of Ares.
Secondly, the language used to describe Ares is overly melodramatic. For example, the line “O Ares, O thou direst of all men’s gods!” seems to exaggerate Ares’ power and influence, making him appear more like a character from a soap opera than a respected deity. This excessive emotional expression can detract from the poem’s emotional depth and make it feel overly simplistic.
Moreover, the speaker’s constant references to Ares as a “thou” rather than a “he” add an unnecessary layer of formality and distance to the character. While this might be intentional to emphasize the speaker’s reverence for Ares, it ultimately makes the character feel less relatable and human. In turn, this distances the reader from the poem’s emotional core.
Furthermore, the poem’s focus on Ares seems to overshadow the speaker’s own emotional journey. While the speaker’s longing for his loved one is palpable, the poem could have benefited from a more balanced exploration of both characters’ feelings. By focusing solely on Ares, the poem misses an opportunity to delve deeper into the complexities of human emotions and relationships.
In conclusion, “Through My Window” presents several issues with its portrayal of Ares. The inconsistencies with the traditional depiction of the Greek god of war, the melodramatic language, the formal tone, and the overemphasis on Ares all contribute to a less than satisfying reading experience. A more nuanced and balanced exploration of both characters’ emotions would have greatly improved the poem’s impact and resonance with the reader.
