Is international relations part of political science? This question has sparked debates among scholars and students alike. While some argue that international relations is a distinct field of study, others contend that it is an integral part of political science. This article aims to explore the relationship between these two disciplines and provide a comprehensive analysis of whether international relations should be considered a part of political science.
The origins of international relations can be traced back to the early 20th century when it emerged as a separate field of study. Initially, it focused on the study of international politics, diplomacy, and the behavior of states in the international system. On the other hand, political science has a broader scope, encompassing the study of political systems, political behavior, and political institutions.
One of the main arguments for considering international relations as a part of political science is the overlap in their subject matter. Both disciplines examine the relationships between states, governments, and individuals in the political realm. International relations, as a subfield of political science, delves deeper into the complexities of international politics, including issues such as global governance, international law, and the role of international organizations. These topics are inherently political and, therefore, fall within the purview of political science.
Moreover, the methodologies used in both international relations and political science are often similar. Both disciplines employ quantitative and qualitative research methods to analyze political phenomena. This shared approach to research strengthens the argument that international relations is a part of political science.
However, there are also arguments against categorizing international relations as a part of political science. Critics argue that international relations has developed its own unique theories, concepts, and research questions that differentiate it from the broader field of political science. For instance, the realist, liberal, and constructivist theories in international relations are distinct from the theories in political science, such as behavioralism and institutionalism. These differences suggest that international relations should be recognized as a separate discipline.
Furthermore, the practical implications of studying international relations also support its independence from political science. The field of international relations has a direct impact on global politics, international law, and international organizations. By focusing on the unique challenges and opportunities of the international system, international relations scholars contribute valuable insights to global governance and policy-making.
In conclusion, whether international relations is part of political science is a matter of debate. While there is a strong case for considering it a part of political science due to the overlap in subject matter and methodologies, the unique theories and practical implications of international relations suggest that it should be recognized as a distinct discipline. Ultimately, the classification of international relations as a part of political science or a separate field depends on the specific context and the goals of the academic institution or researcher.
