Who defined politics as “who gets what when and how”? This question has intrigued scholars and thinkers for centuries, as it delves into the essence of political science and the fundamental nature of human societies. The concept of politics as a distribution of resources and power has been explored by various philosophers, economists, and political theorists, each offering unique perspectives on the subject. This article aims to examine the origins of this definition and discuss the contributions of key figures who have shaped our understanding of politics.
The phrase “who gets what when and how” is often attributed to Harold Lasswell, an American political scientist who made significant contributions to the field of political science in the mid-20th century. Lasswell’s work focused on the study of power, conflict, and decision-making processes within political systems. He believed that politics is essentially about the allocation of resources and the distribution of power among different groups in society.
In his seminal work, “Power and Society,” Lasswell defined politics as “who gets what, when, and how.” This definition highlights the core aspects of political behavior and the struggle for resources and influence. It emphasizes that politics is not just about the formal institutions and processes, but also about the underlying power dynamics that shape the distribution of goods and services in a society.
One of the earliest philosophers to touch upon the concept of politics as resource distribution was Aristotle. In his work “Politics,” he discussed the nature of political power and the distribution of wealth and land among citizens. Aristotle believed that the primary purpose of politics was to create a harmonious society where resources are allocated fairly and justly.
Another influential figure who contributed to the understanding of politics as resource distribution was Max Weber, a German sociologist and political theorist. In his work, “The Theory of Social and Economic Organization,” Weber emphasized the importance of power and authority in shaping political systems. He argued that politics is about the struggle for power and the control over resources, which ultimately determines who gets what and how.
In contemporary political science, the concept of politics as resource distribution has been further developed by scholars such as Robert Dahl and James G. March. Dahl, in his book “Polyarchy,” discussed the nature of democratic politics and the allocation of resources within a pluralistic society. March, on the other hand, explored the role of institutions and norms in shaping political outcomes and resource distribution.
In conclusion, the definition of politics as “who gets what when and how” has been shaped by various philosophers, economists, and political theorists throughout history. From Aristotle and Max Weber to Harold Lasswell and contemporary scholars, the concept of politics as a distribution of resources and power has been central to the study of political science. Understanding this definition helps us unravel the complexities of political behavior and the underlying power dynamics that shape our societies.
