How Big is Mexico City Compared to Los Angeles?
Mexico City, the bustling capital of Mexico, and Los Angeles, the sprawling metropolis of California, are two of the most significant urban centers in the world. When comparing their sizes, the question of “how big is Mexico City compared to Los Angeles?” becomes quite intriguing. This article delves into the dimensions of both cities, providing a comprehensive comparison of their land area, population, and overall scale.
Land Area
Mexico City covers a total area of approximately 1,485 square miles (3,855 square kilometers), making it the largest city in Mexico by land area. In contrast, Los Angeles spans about 502.7 square miles (1,302 square kilometers). This means that Mexico City is nearly three times larger than Los Angeles in terms of land area.
Population
When it comes to population, Mexico City is also significantly larger than Los Angeles. As of 2021, the population of Mexico City is estimated to be around 21.4 million, making it the most populous city in Mexico and the 10th most populous city in the world. Los Angeles, on the other hand, has a population of approximately 3.9 million, ranking it as the second-most populous city in the United States.
Urban Density
Despite Mexico City’s larger land area, it has a lower population density compared to Los Angeles. Mexico City’s population density is about 14,460 people per square mile (5,580 per square kilometer), while Los Angeles has a population density of around 8,200 people per square mile (3,160 per square kilometer). This difference in density can be attributed to the varied urban planning and development patterns in both cities.
Infrastructure and Public Services
The larger size of Mexico City has implications for its infrastructure and public services. The city boasts an extensive public transportation system, including buses, metro lines, and light rail. Los Angeles also has a well-developed public transportation network, although it is smaller in scale compared to Mexico City. Additionally, Mexico City faces challenges in managing its vast urban sprawl, including traffic congestion and air pollution, which are also prevalent in Los Angeles.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Mexico City is significantly larger than Los Angeles in terms of land area and population. However, the two cities have different population densities and face unique challenges in managing their urban growth. Understanding the size and scale of these two megacities provides valuable insights into the complexities of urban development and the diverse ways in which cities can evolve and thrive.
