Strom Thurmond’s Resistance- A Deep Dive into His Stance Against Civil Rights

by liuqiyue

Was Strom Thurmond Against Civil Rights?

Strom Thurmond, a prominent figure in American politics, has been a subject of controversy and debate, particularly concerning his stance on civil rights. Was Strom Thurmond against civil rights? This question delves into the complex history of the man who once held the record for the longest filibuster in U.S. Senate history and who was both a segregationist and a states’ rights advocate.

Thurmond’s opposition to civil rights can be traced back to his early political career. In 1948, he ran as the Democratic nominee for President on a segregationist platform, famously declaring, “I’ll never be satisfied until I have a separate but equal water fountain, restaurant, and waiting room for my people.” This statement was a clear indication of his anti-civil rights stance, which he maintained throughout his political career.

As a senator from South Carolina, Thurmond was a leading figure in the segregationist movement. He voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. He also voted against the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote.

Thurmond’s opposition to civil rights was not limited to his legislative actions. He also made numerous racially charged remarks and engaged in discriminatory practices. In 1946, he was elected governor of South Carolina on a segregationist platform, and during his tenure, he implemented policies that enforced racial segregation in the state.

Despite his long history of opposing civil rights, Thurmond’s views began to evolve in the late 20th century. In 1970, he became the first southern senator to support the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He also began to support the inclusion of African Americans in the Democratic Party. However, some critics argue that these changes were more about political expediency than a genuine change of heart.

In conclusion, Strom Thurmond’s record on civil rights is a complex and contentious issue. While he was initially a vocal opponent of civil rights, his views did appear to evolve over time. Whether or not this evolution was sincere is a matter of debate. Nonetheless, Thurmond’s legacy as a segregationist and his role in opposing civil rights cannot be overlooked.

Related Posts